ONE OF MY EXPERIMENTS' RESULTS
MORE OBSERVATIONS
WHERE TO LOOK
CLOTHING CONTROL
CONNECTION
PAGE 4 0F 11
4
CONTROL INCOGNITO
Another experiment you can do to test the "degree" of CONTROL in any particular garment, is
to break each seam. A "100% cotton" garment will yield the best test. Just cut each seam once, or gently break it in your hands. The most vital ones to break, are those around the neckline and the waist. Also, break the ones around the sleeves, at the shoulder lines, and down the sides.
Be sure to break any seam that encircles your whole body, your neck, your arms, your waist
and your legs. It is not necessary to remove all of the stitching, although I have done that countless times. THEN, after the label has been removed, entirely, and each seams' "connection" broken - launder it. Use HOT water for the best results. If it's white, use CHLORINE BLEACH. Now, dry it
in the dryer, and examine your garment. It will NOT LOOK THE SAME.
Remember, folks, I stated previously that I had dismantled MOUNDS of clothing, more than a hundred articles, in search of THE TRUTH. Without fail, after removing all labels, breaking each seam, and laundering the item - the garment was NOTICEABLY altered in appearance.
By way of illustration - one of my sons had 3 pairs of soft, cotton knit, pull-on pants. They were all identical, except for color. The pants were a gift purchased for him at Sears, a few years before, and he wore them a LOT. The pants had a 1" band of elastic around the waist, held there by about
4-5 rows of very HEAVY nylon interlock stitching, and elastic around the bottom of the legs.
He wore them for a couple of years, then passed them down to younger siblings. Those pants
had retained their shape and color, through AT LEAST 50 separate launderings. I decided to check
the pants for CONTROLS, so I removed 2 or 3 rows of the heavy nylon stitching around the waistband, leaving the other 2 to hold the elastic in place. Then, I washed the pants as usual, with laundry detergent and chlorine bleach. That is how those pants had ALWAYS been washed. These pants, and most of the boys' clothing, seemed to always need bleach, as they generally had grass stains or something else on them.
I want you to understand, that they were washed in EXACTLY THE SAME MANNER as they had ALWAYS been washed. Well, dearly beloved, when they were removed from the washer THIS time, what do you think had occurred? THOSE PANTS HAD NO COLOR IN THEM, except around the gathered cuffs at the bottom of the legs, where I had left the stitching untouched, AND right around the stitiching I had left around the waistband, to keep the elastic in place.
They had lost their "shape" also, and bore little resemblance to their former selves. After removing the labels, and just part of the remaining waistband stitching, which are two things that might have come loose with normal "wear-and-tear", and washed them again - that pair of pants was ready to be discarded. The other 2 never did get in that same condition, as the labels and stitching were left intact.
DOESN'T THAT STRIKE YOU AS ODD?
You can get the evidence yourself, by doing exactly what I did. I got the same results, with very little variance - over and over again. THE OLYMPIANS do things on a grand scale, but a LOT of what they're doing, is on a very PERSONAL level, and I take it - PERSONALLY.
Again - this is not an isolated instance. I conducted this same test on countless articles of clothing - the results were consistently the same. Damaged, altered, sometimes stained apparel.
The process - remove the labels - completely - from under the seam, too. Break the seams, remove some of the synthetic stitching without dismantling the garment. Wash it, dry it, and examine it.
Results? Once more - spots, stains, tiny holes, loss of color, loss of shape, and loss of CONTROLS.
I was constantly exhibiting the results of my research to my family and anyone else who would lend me an ear. I would illustrate, beyond the shadow of a doubt, how there are things in our CLOTHING that assist in tuning us into their CONTROLS and the altered appearance of the clothing, when those things were removed.
The REACTIONS? After initial interest, the reactions I got were usually - "SO WHAT"? Well, what do you mean - "So what?" So...we are being sold a bill of goods that is a sham, and it tunes our minds and bodies into controls that are broadcast by the MASTERS OF PSYOPS - Psychological Operations, i.e. MIND CONTROL.
I don't know about YOU, but when someone uncovers deceit that has been foisted on ME, and reveals something unusual or bizarre that was hidden - I SIT UP AND PAY ATTENTION. I ALWAYS WANT to know the truth, and the whys and wherefores - don't YOU?
Do you enjoy spending extra money to buy new clothes for yourself and your family every time you turn around? Haven't you ever asked a family member - "What did you get on your pants?" or "What did you spill on your good shirt?" - only to have them give you a blank stare, or look at you in shock and ignorance, and say - "I have no IDEA!" Yet, the stain is there, the hole is there, the spot is there. Well, according to the results of my research, it probably wasn't their doing at all.
Repeated machine washings don't destroy clothing nearly as quickly, as a seam that is broken,
or if the tag or label has been COMPLETELY removed. The thrift stores and second-hand stores are FULL of almost-new clothing that has a stain or a hole in it, usually in a very conspicuous place. The garment has been discarded, only to be replaced by a new one, so the entire process can start all
over again. Brand-new clothes, brand-new CONTROLS.
Good shirts typically have 3 separate labels - 2 at the inside neckline, along with printing inside the collar, and 1 down below - either on an inside seam which is in contact with your skin, or at the very bottom of the button/buttonhole area. Sometimes, there will be an additional label stitched
on the outside of the left pocket, right in the general vicinity of the heart. They are NOT THERE
BY ACCIDENT OR OVERSIGHT. These labels, tags, shoulder pads, buttons and stitching all form a type of collective unit, an "antenna" formation, if you will, that helps to facilitate CONTROL over your person, and over your MIND.
In jeans, they are inside the zipper area, contacting a VERY sensitive spot around the abdomen and groin, or on the back pocket, inside the waistband - often right over the spine area, or on the outside right top of the waistband, and over the navel, via the snap or the button. As time marches on, the CONTROLS put into the clothing get more plentiful, and they get stronger.
Those of you who are well-padded, will not notice as strong a reaction to the CONTROLS. By that, I mean that you won't FEEL them as distinctly. Regardless, you WILL be affected by them, just the same. Please bear in mind, the minds that designed these controls, are basically the same ones that have brought us the MICROCHIP, FIBER OPTICS, SPY SATELLITES IN THE SKY, LASER SURGERY, SPACE TECHNOLOGY, AND "MIRACLE DRUGS". Before you reject the idea of widespread CONTROLS
in our clothing as impossible, consider this - in every pill a doctor prescribes, how much of that pill
is the actual DRUG? How much MSG does it take, in a meal, to throw someone's brain out of whack? How much FLUORIDE does it take, you know, the stuff they put in our water, to poison your nervous system, and take your PERSONAL INITIATIVE away? How much Clostridium botulinum - BOTULISM - does it take to KILL a man?
The answer to all of the above, is - NOT MUCH!
How large is a fiber optic cable, capable of handling thousands of phone calls? About the size of a human hair. There are LCD screens much smaller than a dime, and what is in our clothing is TINY.
Ok - let's see what else is in our clothing, that helps keep us under their CONTROL.
It bears repeating:
"KNOWLEDGE REJECTED IS
A FEARSOME MASTER."
This page was last updated: October 28, 2022
subtly, secretly, silently, successfully...
The opinions expressed here are purely mine. Any references to real people are purely --- INTENTIONAL.
Og Nito © All Rights Reserved
"Wise Men STILL Seek Him"
